Weiner's Women

Day to day 'Blogengeezer' events/activities/projects also posted on http://daflikkers.wordpress.com/ 
 
 This post was rec'd in email. It pertains to the attitude of acceptance, for some unexplainable reason, now running rampant across the United States of America...

"How do you comprehend ANY WOMAN getting past Weiner's evil face and narcissistic ego"?! HOW? Not to mention flirting with him, much less engaging in sexual conversation with a total stranger, one who is disgusting and lewd? And then, God FORBID, looking at those pictures and continuing to have interaction with him, on and on... ad nauseum? To make it even worse, there were multiple WOMEN doing so.

 Attention, Women:
 "A woman without discretion is like a pig with a gold ring in its snout."
 The Book of Proverbs
 Holy Bible, Book Divine

 THINK ABOUT THE SICKNESS IN THE MAN! The perversion in Weiner was once called a crime (exhibitionism) and considered a threat to the safety of women and children, therefore, warranting incarceration. It is currently considered AT LEAST a psychological disorder. And did any of you women notice he wants pornographic attention from as many women as he can get (that's what exhibitionists do--"Once is Never Enough.")? It's sick! Why would any woman stoop so low to give attention to a man like Weiner?

 Does anyone remember 'ALL THE LIES' Weiner gave, in denying his perverse behavior when he was a Senator?! Why would NYC want him in office? He's a security threat to the public. And a menace to public decency. Men still get arrested for exposing themselves, unless it's on the Internet. Is there ANY DIFFERENCE in the behavior, except the forum of exposure?

 And that's only the beginning of my righteous indignation. Is this the level of class, character, and dignity, America demands in public officials?  http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/24/opinion/borger-weiner/index.html?hpt=hp_c2  Is the Democrat Party so desperate, that this man is the level of character they accept? And even promote (WHO is 'funding' his campaign?) for Mayor of NYC?


  Thanks, Democrats! You didn't know the moral aftermath of what you were doing when you covered for Bill Clinton (his oral sex with a subordinate in the White House) and brazenly justified his keeping the Presidency. You now face more rank sewers of corrupt politicians and claim it's private behavior. Well, it isn't private, and children are watching.

 Surely there is someone in your ranks who finds these indecent fellow-Democrats unacceptable. Why are there no livid and loud objections coming from your party? It isn't enough to say Weiner should withdraw from the Mayor's race. You should denounce Weiner publicly for the sake of our children as well as the security of our country, not to mention the future of your party.
 
 The clear message from you Democrats is this: If Weiner can win, you don't care what kind of character he has, not to mention the security threat and corruption of lying behavior he brings into office. Beware.... your party is becoming associated with... "phony? scandals"... that are truly Tragic scandals throughout the beloved federal bureaucracy that you populate to stay in office. Do you realize that you may win elections, but America is the loser in the long run, http://www.tpnn.com/video-tpnns-scottie-nell-hughes-fiery-hannity-audience-panel-discuss-cultural-decay/   if 'corrupt power' is all you care about? There's a huge, smelly sewer swallowing up the Democrat Party. You need to CLEAN HOUSE.

 Linda K.
 American Citizen and Voter 

Additional links are easy to find.
http://dailycaller.com/2013/07/25/sydney-leathers-details-weiners-declarations-of-love-shoe-fetish/ 

Boston, National Guard Units Ambushed

Day to day Blogengeezer events/activities/projects also posted on http://daflikkers.wordpress.com/ 
 

Boston – National Guard units seeking to confiscate a cache of recently banned assault weapons, were ambushed by elements of a Para-military extremist faction. Military and law enforcement sources estimate that 72 were killed and more than 200 injured, before government forces were compelled to withdraw.

Speaking after the clash, Massachusetts Governor Thomas Gage declared that the extremist faction, which was made up of local citizens, has links to the radical right-wing tax protest movement.

Gage blamed the extremists for recent incidents of vandalism directed against internal revenue offices. The governor, who described the group’s organizers as “criminals,” issued an executive order authorizing the summary arrest of any individual who has interfered with the government’s efforts to secure law and order.

The military raid on the extremist arsenal followed wide-spread refusal by the local citizenry to turn over recently outlawed assault weapons.

Gage issued a ban on military-style assault weapons and ammunition earlier in the week. This decision followed a meeting in early this month between government and military leaders, at which the governor authorized the forcible confiscation of illegal arms.

One government official, speaking on condition of anonymity, pointed out that “none of these people would have been killed had the extremists obeyed the law and turned over their weapons voluntarily.”

Government troops initially succeeded in confiscating a large supply of outlawed weapons and ammunition. However, troops attempting to seize arms and ammunition in Lexington met with resistance from heavily-armed extremists who had been tipped off regarding the government’s plans.

During a tense standoff in the Lexington town park, National Guard Colonel Francis Smith, commander of the government operation, ordered the armed group to surrender and return to their homes. The impasse was broken by a single shot, which was reportedly fired by one of the right-wing extremists.

Eight civilians were killed in the ensuing exchange.

Ironically, the local citizenry blamed government forces rather than the extremists for the civilian deaths. Before order could be restored, armed citizens from surrounding areas had descended upon the guard units. Colonel Smith, finding his forces over matched by the armed mob, ordered a retreat.

Governor Gage has called upon citizens to support the state/national joint task force in its effort to restore law and order. The governor also demanded the surrender of those responsible for planning and leading the attack against the government troops.

Samuel Adams, Paul Revere, and John Hancock, who have been identified as “ringleaders” of the extremist faction, remain at large.

And this fellow Americans, is how the American Revolution began, April 20, 1775.

On July 4th, 1776 these same Extremists signed the Declaration of Independence, pledging to each other and their countrymen, their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor. Many of them lost everything, including their families and their lives, over the course of the next few years.

Lest we forget… 

Post re: email received

Fallacies of Govt funded Pre-School

Comment by Doc, on an msn thread about Obama ridiculing Rubio, for drinking water, while ignoring Benghazi and advocating 'sequester' cutting Only of expenses that affect citizens employment and Not bureaucracy expanding systems.

doc365

6 hours ago

---

2. Obama’s Education Policy Called ‘Lopsided’
President Barack Obama has consistently promoted universal govt preschool, while discouraging private school voucher programs — an approach that has been called “lopsided.”

In his recent State of the Union address, Obama urged Congress to make “high-quality govt preschool available (mandatory) to every single child in America,” claiming that “study after study shows that the sooner a child begins learning, the better he or she does down the road.”

But in fact, studies have shown “the exact opposite — that publicly funded preschool programs make no lasting difference in a child’s life,” according to a report from the Reason Foundation.

The report cites the example of Head Start, a five-decade-old early learning program aimed at low-income toddlers. About 1 million children are enrolled in the program each year, at a cost of about $8,000 per child.
But a majority of studies have shown that while Head Start participants show initial gains, these gains disappear when they enter regular school.

Those studies’ findings are confirmed by a recent report from the Department of Health and Human Services, “the most ambitious and expensive evaluation of the program that the administration did its best to bury by releasing it on the Friday before Christmas,” Reason observes.
The study followed children up to the third grade instead of measuring school readiness for first grade, as many earlier studies had done.

Among the findings, the report states: “Looking across the full study period, from the beginning of Head Start through third grade, the evidence is clear that access to Head Start improved children’s preschool outcomes across developmental domains, but had few impacts on children in kindergarten through third grade…

“In summary, there were initial positive impacts from having access to Head Start, but by the end of third grade there were very few impacts found in any of the four domains of cognitive, social-emotional, health and parenting practices.”

In its article headlined “Obama’s Lopsided Education Policy,” Reason contrasts Obama’s promotion of preschool with his opposition to voucher programs.

“At every opportunity he has tried to kill the Washington, D.C., voucher program that serves about 1,600 poor minority kids,” write authors Shikha Dalmia, a senior analyst at Reason, and Lisa Snell, director of education policy.

“Every year the president has tried to withhold its measly $20 million funding, half of what the government would spend on these kids if they stayed in public schools.”
Nine out of 10 major voucher studies found that vouchers improved reading and math performance by voucher students.

18 of 19 studies showed that competition from voucher schools actually improved educational success in public schools as well.
“Vouchers are cheap and effective, whereas publicly funded preschool is expensive and ineffective,” Reason concludes.

“That’s what the evidence shows. And if President Obama wanted to be true to what is effective, rather than indulge his ideological fancy, he would push universal vouchers to improve student performance — not universal preschool.”