Thursday, October 17, 2013

1,400 yrs against Intermarriage (preferring instead, 'In-Breeding')

Think about this 'guest' post, after reading 'facts' about 'Lucy' of National Geographic fame, the worshiped darling of evolutionists.

Then compare historic documentation to 'Otzi' the Iceman
With a link to National Geographic and updated info.

 With the 'Cradle of Humanity' in Africa, Evolution dictates (they discount the Theory) Africa 'should be' the scientific intelligence, productivity and prosperity center of all humanity on earth?

Of course that is the logic of Evolution, at least from what the proponents of Evolution insist. "Every living thing observable on earth, naturally escalates exponentially in complexity and 'intelligence of design"....?

Really? 'They' demand (taught in schools by Law) that we all 'believe'... Is it that simple? If so, it takes far more faith than a belief in a Supreme Creator.

Tell that to the historically perpetual, countless millions of victims of mindless, endless savage tribal strife, sexual mutilation, torture, inter-tribal slavery/marketing, thievery and slaughter... and of historic importance... Perpetual Dependency Addiction. Apparently these are the end results of 'Intra-familial' marriages? Consanguinity? When 20-50% of all marriages in North Africa, Middle East, and West Asia are kept 'In the Family' there are eventual consequences. Dire consequences.

As just one relatively recent example, Never forget the UN instigated (NPRTV)  Hutu (Islamic majority) genocide perpetrated against Tutsi... Deadly Racism, leading an entire culture into Socialized insanity, a 'Hell on Earth'. A Hell only to be rectified by the well armed, ex-pat Tutsi (Christianity based minority), returning to restore a semblance of order to Rwanda.

This subject is controversial/divisive (isn't everything today?) and from another 'guest' email that 'New' Blogger may, or may not allow. We will see if it posts. If it is readable, or degraded as a technologically obsolete, analog copy of a copy of a copy..

1,400 years of 'In-Breeding', may explain a lot of things.

This came from a Lockheed pilot(?) who has had 3 assignments to Saudi Arabia. 1,400 YEARS OF IN-BREEDING. worth the read.
During the pilot transition program with the KV-107 and C-130 with Lockheed, we found that most Saudi pilot trainees had very limited night vision, even on the brightest of moon lit nights. Their training retention rate was minimal including maintenance personnel.
Some had dim memories and had to be constantly reminded of things that were told to them the day before. Needless to say, an American, British or any other western instructor gets burned out pretty quick. It actually took Muslim C-130 pilots, years before they could fly in the dark safely and then would be reluctant to leave the lights of a city.
Ask any Marine, Air Force or Army guy who’s been trying to train the Iraqis, and especially Afghans. They will say, "Yep, dumber than homemade dodo".
Islam is not only a religion, it's a way of life all the way around. Yet another set of revealing facts about Muslim beliefs and traditions and ways of life.
1400 years of inbreeding.  I found this to be interesting. Didn't know whether to believe it or not. To research I went to Wikipedia, "Cousin Marriage", and far down in the article "Genetics", it seems there is a lot of truth here.
A huge Muslim problem: Inbreeding
Nikolai Sennels is a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into a little-known problem in the Muslim world: the disastrous results of Muslim inbreeding brought about by the marriage of first-cousins.
This practice, which has been prohibited in the Judeo-Christian tradition since the days of Moses, was sanctioned by Muhammad and has been going on now for 50 generations (1,400 years) in the Muslim world.
This practice of inbreeding will never go away in the Muslim world, since Muhammad is the ultimate example and authority on all matters, including marriage.
The massive inbreeding in Muslim culture may well have done virtually irreversible damage to the Muslim gene pool, including extensive damage to its intelligence, sanity, and health.
According to Sennels, close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred. In Pakistan, the numbers approach 70%. Even in England, more than half of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins, and in Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%.
The numbers are equally devastating in other important Muslim countries: 67% in Saudi Arabia, 64% in Jordan, and Kuwait, 63% in Sudan, 60% in Iraq, and 54% in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar.
According to the BBC, this Pakistani, Muslim-inspired inbreeding is thought to explain the probability that a British Pakistani family is more than 13 times as likely to have children with recessive genetic disorders. While Pakistanis are responsible for three percent of the births in the UK, they account for 33% of children with genetic birth defects.
The risks of what are called autosomal recessive disorders such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher and the risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher.
Other negative consequences of inbreeding include a 100 percent increase in the risk of still births and a 50% increase in the possibility that a child will die during labor.
Lowered intellectual capacity is another devastating consequence of Muslim marriage patterns. According to Sennels, research shows that children of consanguineous marriages lose 10-16 points off their IQ and that social abilities develop much slower in inbred babies. The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as "retarded," increases by an astonishing 400 percent among children of cousin marriages. (Similar effects were seen in the Pharaonic dynasties in ancient Egypt and in the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant period of time.)
In Denmark, non-Western immigrants are more than 300 percent more likely to fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army.
Sennels says that "the ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking is simply lower in the Islamic world." He points out that the Arab world translates just 330 books every year, about 20% of what Greece alone does.
In the last 1,200 years of Islam, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain does in a single year. Seven out of 10 Turks have never even read a book.
Sennels points out the difficulties this creates for Muslims seeking to succeed in the West. "A lower IQ, together with a religion that denounces critical thinking, surely makes it harder for many Muslims to have success in our high-tech knowledge societies."
Only nine Muslims have ever won the Nobel Prize, and five of those were for the "Peace Prize." According to Nature magazine, Muslim countries produce just 10 percent of the world average when it comes to scientific research measured by articles per million inhabitants.
In Denmark, Sennels' native country, Muslim children are grossly over represented among children with special needs. One-third of the budget for Danish schools is consumed by special education, and anywhere from 51% to 70% of retarded children with physical handicaps in Copenhagen have an immigrant background. Learning ability is severely affected as well. Studies indicated that 64% of school children with Arabic parents are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system. The immigrant drop-out rate in Danish high schools is twice that of the native-born.
Mental illness is also a product. The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of schizophrenic illness. The increased risk of insanity may explain why more than 40% of patients in Denmark’s biggest ward for clinically insane criminals have an immigrant background.
The U.S. is not immune. According to Sennels, "One study based on 300,000 Americans shows that the majority of Muslims in the USA have a lower income, are less educated, and have worse jobs than the population as a whole."
Sennels concludes: There is no doubt that the wide spread tradition of first cousin marriages among Muslims has harmed the gene pool among Muslims. Because Muslims' religious beliefs prohibit marrying non-Muslims and thus prevents them from adding fresh genetic material to their population, the genetic damage done to their gene pool since their prophet allowed first cousin marriages 1,400 years ago are most likely massive. This has produced overwhelming direct and indirect human and societal consequences.
Bottom line: Islam is not simply a benign and morally equivalent alternative to the Judeo-Christian tradition. As Sennels points out, the first and biggest victims of Islam are Muslims. Simple Judeo-Christian compassion for Muslims and a common-sense desire to protect Western civilization from the ravages of Islam, dictate a vigorous opposition to the spread of this dark and dangerous religion. These stark realities must be taken into account when we establish public polices dealing with immigration from Muslim countries and the building of mosques in the U.S.
Let's hope the civilized West and the North Americans wake up before a blind naiveté about the reality of Islam destroys what remains of our Judeo-Christian culture and our domestic tranquility.


Blogger Blogengeezer said...

There are 'cultures' that respond to stimulus in far differing ways. I am quite familiar with Guns and Bicycles, both are technological marvels. Both equalize societies to survive. Send One Bicycle and one Gun to some cultures and within a short time they will have factories building countless millions of bicycles.... and Guns.

There are other cultures whereby you send a million bicycles (or Guns) and within a short time the bicycles are worn out, the guns are used up (on each other), and the culture Demands More.

The adage "Teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime". GIVE a man a fish in today's dependency addicted culture and every day he will be at your door, Demanding ever more fish.

10:06 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home