Friday, September 27, 2013

Obacare renders the US Constitution irrelevant.

See if this one, from another email, posts? From another source, this puts this current administration in an unfavorable position, as instigating 'full on' unconstitutional National Socialism under Obamacare. In spite of bluster to the contrary, surely to be fully funded into the decaying future, as all National Socialism. A respected Constitutional Law professional, researched the entire OCare bill, now on verge of acceptance by a naively gullible electorate. 'New' Blogger, true to form, deleted this 'copied from email', post by a guest.


verified this with Snopes, and you can too--Ed

A Constitutional lawyer has read the entire health care bill. His findings:

Snopes says this is correctly attributed…

A retired Constitutional lawyer has read the entire proposed health care bill. Read his conclusions and pass this on as you wish. This is stunning!

Please take the time to read this and forward it out as you see fit.

The Truth About the Health Care Bills
– Michael Connelly, Ret. Constitutional Attorney

Well, I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill 3200:
The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009.
I studied it with particular emphasis from my area of expertise, constitutional law. I was frankly concerned that parts of the proposed law that were being discussed might be unconstitutional. What I found was far worse than what I had heard or expected.

To begin with, much of what has been said about the law and its implications is in fact true, despite what the Democrats and the media are saying. The law does provide for rationing of health care, particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion services, and probably forced participation in abortions by  members of the medical profession.

The Bill will also eventually force private insurance companies out of business, and put everyone into a government run system. All decisions about personal health care will ultimately be made by federal bureaucrats, and most of them will not be health care professionals. Hospital admissions, payments to physicians, and allocations of necessary medical devices will be strictly controlled by the government.

However, as scary as all of that is, it just scratches the surface. In fact, I have concluded that this legislation really has no intention of providing affordable health care choices. Instead it is a convenient cover for the most massive transfer of power to the Executive Branch of government that has ever occurred, or even been contemplated. If this law or a similar one is adopted, major portions of the Constitution of the United States will effectively have been destroyed.

The first thing  to go will be the masterfully crafted balance of power between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the U.S. Government. The Congress will be transferring to the Obama Administration authority in a number of different areas over the lives of the American people, and the businesses they own.

The irony is that the Congress doesn't have any authority to legislate in most of those areas to begin with! I defy anyone to read the text of the U.S. Constitution and find any authority granted to the members of Congress to regulate health care.

This legislation also provides for access, by the appointees of the Obama administration, in direct violation of the specific provisions of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution, of all of your personal healthcare information, your personal financial information, and the information of your employer, physician, and hospital. All of this is a protecting against unreasonable searches and  seizures. You can also forget about the right to privacy. That will have been legislated into oblivion regardless of what the 3rd and 4th Amendments may provide.

If you decide not to have healthcare insurance, or if you have private insurance that is not deemed acceptable to the Health Choices Administrator appointed by Obama, there will be a tax imposed on you. It is called a tax instead of a fine because of the intent to avoid application of the due process clause of the 5th Amendment. However , that doesn't work because since there is nothing in the law that allows you to contest or appeal the imposition of the tax, it is definitely depriving someone of property without the due process of law.

So, there are three of those pesky amendments that the far left hate so much, out the original ten in the Bill of Rights, that are effectively nullified by this law. It doesn't stop there though.

The 9th Amendment that provides: The  enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people;

The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control.

I could write many more pages about this legislation, but I think you get the idea. This is not about health care; it is about seizing power and limiting rights. Article 6 of the Constitution requires the members of both houses of Congress to "be bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution." If I was a member of Congress I would not be able to vote for this legislation or anything like it, without feeling I was violating  that sacred oath or affirmation. If I voted for it anyway, I would hope the American people would hold me accountable.

For those who might doubt the nature of this threat, I suggest they consult the source, the US Constitution, and Bill of Rights. There you can see exactly what we are about to have taken from us.

Michael Connelly
Retired attorney,
Constitutional Law Instructor
Carrollton , Texas


If you don't care about our constitution, or your rights under it, just do nothing.


Thursday, September 26, 2013

Quirky California education system, that will set 'The Law' for the USA.

Here is another excellent post, copied from an AOL email. It concerns the universally political leftists controlled California education system and it's fatal quirks, that will eventually affect (Infect) all of the USA. As in other Controversial political posts from this 'guest' (algorithms catch them?), I now always expect a blank page from 'New' Blogger, so here goes nothing. BTW these posts are accepted with no problem, from 'Wordpress', where I often re-post the exact same, politically unPC 'editorials' attacking the Liberal Leftists. /

California once again leads the nation. Seems there was a person nominated as homecoming queen in Huntington Beach, California. This is the heart of Orange County, one of the last stands of OTHER than Socialist-Liberal-Progressive-Democrats. The very proud student body of Marina High School nominated and elected a transgender homecoming queen. Made the news all over the country. Basically this creature was born a male, with all of the equipment of a male, but felt like a female, so is now homecoming queen. No mention how the king felt about it. Basically he/she can use all of the 'female only' sports, restrooms, locker rooms, and showers. It's the law in California.

Recently had a getaway weekend to a small town in the mountains above San Diego. Found a nice small restaurant that had good food. Two teenage waitresses, high school, were working it. Very efficient, prompt service, correct with the order. Only not really a complaint, more as an observation, that they were trying their hand at lesbianism. Gay, either sex, is the in thing with kids in school. In the old days...but then we were taught some values and not subjected to the S-L-P-D values, or lack of. These are impressionable kids, not able to make decisions on their own. If they really are lesbians fine. If not, then they are trying the new IN fad, that's sad.
In Arkansas kindergarten kid had his peanut butter and jelly sandwich taken from him because the school KNEW he might trade sandwiches with someone allergic to peanut butter. The parents weren't told the school banned peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. Ah, another lesson from Big Bro.
Back to Progressive California. The Los Angeles School District has spent over $1 billion (B) dollars so every kid in school can have an apple iPad. It's not yet been determined who pays when the students lose, sell, break, or have stolen their new toy. Bet it won't be the student or parents. Then the school districts say they are broke. Yep, Mr. & Mrs. Taxpayer give more of your "Fair Share".
Maybe these are reasons why we need charter, private, and home schooling. The whole educational systems is run by the teachers union and the nut house. Screw the taxpayer who pays for this nonsense.
Again California leads the nation. We don't have enough un-employed, so the S-L-P-D have raised the minimum wage from $8.50/hr. to $10.00/hr. This will raise the cost of everything to pay for the minimum wage, will prevent entry level jobs for the high school students and put more people on welfare. Is this a great state or what? If $10 is good, then why not $20, or $40, or $50, or $100, hell make it a $1,000 per day, let 'the rich' (whomever that is today) pay for it.
Guest post

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Jesse Jackson Jr now 'on the forever dole', Govt subsidized Obsessive Compulsive crook?

Here we go again. Let's see what 'New' blogger does with this emailed text about the current national administration. If there is text below, then their algorithms could not discover any key words, or the email this post is from, is an approved 'Guest'.
Jesse Jackson Jr Proves Crime Pays..... For Washington DC.... insiders.
Victim of 'Bipolar malfeasance' ? 

Graft, of historic proportions:

 In yet another (of countless) sign, Washington DC is now hopelessly corrupt, witness disgraced Illinois 'Democratic' Representative........ Jesse Jackson Jr.

Jackson will collect tens of thousands of dollars in government disability pay, all while serving time for defrauding government.

Seems the feds bought his last-minute claims of a "mood disorder," qualifying him for a reported $8,700 a month in federal aid.

This outrageous largess comes on top of a partial federal pension of $45,000 he'll also collect, despite his sins in office. This is the same convicted swindler who lined his pockets with federal campaign cash.

As the feds were closing in on Jackson, he suddenly didn't feel so hot. He vanished for two weeks from his Capitol office before his staff disclosed he was on medical leave for "exhaustion."

When it became obvious the lawmaker wasn't returning, and more obvious that the feds were preparing an indictment, Democratic leaders pressed his staff for more information. They responded that his condition was worse than previously thought and required hospitalization.

His previously described exhaustion was actually "emotional problems," which then turned into "mood swings," which later became a full-blown "mood disorder."

The Jackson family finally settled on a diagnosis of "bipolar disorder," a mental illness that conveniently makes Junior eligible for generous federal disability.

Funny, Junior never showed any symptoms during his 17 years as a U.S. lawmaker. His illness didn't appear until FBI agents started knocking.

They first looked into a 2008 meeting his top fundraiser had with convicted Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich to try to get Jackson the Senate seat vacated when Obama moved to the White House.

While agents probed that bribery scheme, for which his fundraiser went to jail, they discovered other Jackson graft. Turned out the preacher's son had been using campaign cash as a "personal piggy bank" to buy luxury items for himself and his wife.

Then his symptoms worsened in a pathetic sympathy ploy, which worked. Last month, Jackson received a relatively light sentence of 30 months in federal prison.

He admitted spending at least $750,000 of public funds on personal items, including a $43,350 gold Rolex, $5,150 worth of mink capes and parkas from Beverly Hills, a $4,600 Michael Jackson fedora and $2,200 worth of Malcolm X memorabilia.

The feds plan to auction off the loot, along with ill-gotten jewelry, cashmere caps and a pair of elk heads that once hung in the Jackson mansion.

Jackson had faced 46 to 57 months in jail under a plea agreement. His wife, Sandi, who also recently resigned from public office, pleaded guilty to separate tax fraud charges.

The indictment says Jackson engaged in at least a seven-year conspiracy to defraud the public. And it may even predate 2005.

Fully a decade ago, the conservative press reported Jackson failed to disclose real-estate assets and income on his congressional financial disclosure forms.

It also discovered he got a sweetheart mortgage on a nine-bedroom mansion. He owned two other properties, plus five BMWs costing a total of $300,000.

The major media ignored the suspicious small fortune Jackson had amassed, along with his failure to fully disclose it. The Sunday news shows even ignored Jackson's indictment.

Now they're looking the other way as another corrupt Democrat cashes in on a career of crime.

'EVERYONE' Forced onto Obamacare, EVERYONE! Including the Leaders of The United States of America. No Exemptions! note: of course 'New' Blogger will delete the post

 Here is another email post sent by AOL (may be the problem?) Let's see what shows on 'New' Blogger. Past posts show blank screens. It mentions this sitting president and his enablers in an inconvenient position of Exempting Themselves from the plan they Demand Everyone Else to accept. No obscenities, as are my rules. Seems obscenities are fine to post, but only if mentioning past presidents.
 Posted by guest:

Now I'm going to do something I seldom do, complain about the Republicans. I do not complain about them because for the most part, in Washington D.C. and California, they are irrelevant.

This time I think the GOP is wrong about Obamacare. The House is trying to withhold funding for Obamacare and I think that is wrong. Obmacare is the law of the land now and it should be 100% funded. What I think the GOP should do, and must do to become relevant, is to insist EVERYONE is on Obamacare. Start with the White House and the current parasites who occupy it, their staff, all of Congress AND their staff. The whole Supreme Court, because they approved it, and all city, county, state, and federal workers. All unions, none excepted. If it's so good for everyone else why are the elites exempting themselves? I mean by now Nancy Pelosi has had time to read it, or at least the coloring book version. ALL voters, Republicans and Democrats, and everyone else, Communists, Nazi's, Green's, Black Power, everyone should insist that the rulers and elites in our society have to abide by the same laws the rest of us do. What is so wrong about EQUALITY? In Orwell's "Animal Farm" it is stated that all animals are created equal, just some are more equal. That is wrong! EVERYONE should have Obamacare, no exceptions! write your lawmaker, insist on EQUALITY for everyone.
The only thing that saves us from the bureaucracy is inefficiency. An efficient bureaucracy is the greatest threat to liberty.
Eugene McCarthy
Global Warming is now being questioned as to the facts. Wow, imagine that, it might be wrong. Then Al Gore, who received a Nobel Piece Prize (same as Obama) and an irrelevant Academy Award for his propaganda film would lose out on the carbon trading (a scam if there ever was one). If you believe in carbon trade then how about oxygen trade, or how about hydrogen trade, or how about Di-Hydrogen Monoxide. I have an investment portfolio set up for anyone who wants to buy into these schemes. Just send me the money.
The EXPERTS are still clinging to Global Warming, those whose pay checks depend on it, and are explaining that if you factor out the facts that the earth is cooling and Global Warming wasn't really due to sun spot activity, which has ceased for now, we still have Global Warming due to man made carbon.
That's kind of like the theory of immortality. The theory works if you factor out death.
Show me where I'm wrong.
Guest poster

Friday, September 20, 2013

Chicago Shootout

Here is another Guest post from email (AOL) that is factual about a 'culture' of Diversity with their leader now in presidential Power, that is a direct reflection on their totally govt subsidized way of life. Only due to the pictures in the on line readable story, would the ill-informed public know who the culture is. Keep in mind that deadliest city Chicago, is 'Gun Free' while Houston has freedom to own guns. Doubtful that 'New' Blogger will allow me to post the emailed content, but we will try.

Blank screen, just as predicted...
There was a shootout this morning in Chicago in which 13 people were shot, including a 3 year old. Obviously this is a wrong story, as guns are illegal in Chicago.

 Didn't the Community Organizers explain that to the hoods in the hood? Guess not, better to blame the Honkey Cracker for your culture than to look in the mirror.

Seems to be that way for all Socialist-Liberal-Progressive-Democrats, blame the GOP or Tea Party for your failures and the fawning mainstream media will go along with the accusations. Truth and facts don't matter none.

Chicago vs. Houston
Chicago: Number of gun stores                                      0
Houston:                                                                      1584 places that sell guns and ammunition
2012 Homicides, that would be confirmed kills:
Chicago:                                                                      896
Houston:                                                                      207
Deaths per 100,000 residents
Chicago:                                                                      28.4
Houston:                                                                       9.6
Would seem to me that some Community Organizer didn't do a very good job of organizing. Am I surprised! Smartest guy in the room didn't do his job.
Socialist-Liberal-Progressive-Democrats did a survey to determine how many guns were illegally sold on line. Using taxpayers dollars for the study it was found that of 607 on-line gun sales 30 would be considered illegal. Proof that more laws are needed.
Media does it again. When the first report of the shootout at the Navy Yard in VA it was reported that an AK-47 assault rifle, shot gun and pistol were used. Upon further investigation no AK-47 was found. Once again Obama lap dogs get it wrong. Black man shoots white people, when does the march with Jesse, Al, Obama, and Holder begin?
Show me where I'm wrong.

Thursday, September 19, 2013

DC Naval Yard, SSRI's possibly involved?

Until further information is released, all cards are possible. Given the last official responses to loudly proclaimed gun atrocities, I do not hold my breath. If SSRI's are found to have been involved, it will not be the first time.

One of countless examples: John Hyde Abq NM Aug 2005    killed several innocent people during a 1 day rampage, including two veteran officers sent to restrain him, by request of hospital staff alerted by 'concerned' threatened family. Family had previously asked for treatment and 'commitment'. Denied in each case by laws changed during Reagan years Congress. Changed by ACLU driven interests of misdirected/misinformed compassion.

Hollywood's knee jerk magnified portrayal of a flawed system, 'One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest' (Jack Nicholson), was symptomatic of the misdirected, attitude of naivete that drove the neutering of 'commitment' laws. It didn't take long for the USA's perpetually dependent, govt subsidized homeless (among countless thousands of others), to become an unmanageable urban plague, periodically deadly violent, across the nation.

After that historic ruling, 'basically no one can be 'committed', if they themselves do not agree. Court orders (only 'after' deadly violence) being the exception. John Hyde is now locked away. It took deadly violence to restore legalistic common sense. Hyde is still re-evaluated every two years. Though unlikely, Hyde could conceivably be released back into vulnerable society.

There are massively funded, govt subsidized legal agencies that defend every mentally deficient person's 'right' to stay roaming on the streets, no matter what the threats to society. Those legal entities have absolutely no interest in rocking the financial boat that 'enables' their profession. They actually defend the violently dysfunctional practice vigorously. Proclaiming that with more taxation and more funding they could do even more for 'the People'.

John Hyde was prescribed govt subsidized SSRI's (the one overwhelmingly common factor in these last several atrocities over the years). SSRI's, which when halted sporadically, drastically alter the violence prone person's concern for targeted victims. Under normal serotonin levels, the person is reportedly a kitten, a model of caring, compassionate society. Note the shock of friends and family 'after' their atrocity. The words often are "He was turning his life around".

A 'flat lining' of moral emotions, prevents the natural, logical remorse associated with a normal person's regrets, most times causing '2nd thoughts' before consummating a 'plan' of destruction against humanity. SSRI's reduce/shut down the body's own serotonin production mechanism. When not taken regularly, the person can easily 'go postal', often resulting in suicide (a mentally flawed person, trusted responsible for 'taking' his own 'meds'?). Note the US Military with rampant suicides, is now suffering from the prolific administration of prescribed/subsidized SSRI's.

Outrageous Violence far too often becomes a justifiable 'must do' accomplishment, satisfying to the drastically, chemically altered person's mental state. There is no remorse. Death is expected after the 'accomplishment' of the plan of destruction.

Woe be to anyone that naively crosses paths with these govt subsidized/enabled Zombies. Disarmed citizenry, rendered incapable of instant response to the threat, is especially vulnerable, as each past atrocious instance has demonstrated. Disarming society is to further the totalitarian 'control' agenda of National Socialism, in no way reducing the underlying causation.

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Four simple Questions of presidential legitimacy. Curious?

These are the basic questions asked about the fauxny birth certificate of 'you know who'.
The dates and names reportedly have no logical relevance, as they are using present day names as official. Names of nations and hospitals barely conceptualized in 1961., DailyKos and other Liberal Leftist sites of course will argue in favor of 'their Corner'.

The text of this simple question list may be censored by 'New' Blogger's algorithms? Possibly because it contains the name of a now famous 'man of liberal Left agendas'. A mystery man, inserted into the 'control' position over the last freedom based, One Nation under God on earth, for whatever prophesied reason. Also the text, including links for verification of the facts, was copied from an AOL email from a 'Guest' known to ask questions of legitimacy. Here below is the text... or if recent experience with 'New' Blogger is any indication, the space it would have taken.

4 Rather Simple Questions
1. Back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes.' So how can the Obama 'birth certificate' state he is "African-American" when the term wasn't even used at that time?
2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961 & Lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right ? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is age 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in "Kenya, East Africa ". This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the "British East Africa Protectorate".      

3. On the Birth Certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital". This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home", respectively. The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978 ?
http//       (

4. Perhaps a clue comes from Obama's book on his father. He states how proud he is of his father fighting in WW II. I'm not a math genius, so I may need some help from you. Barack Obama's "birth certificate" says his father was 25 years old in 1961 when he was born. That should have put his father's date of birth approximately 1936 - if my math holds (Honest! I did that without a calculator!!!) Now we need a non-revised history book-one that hasn't been altered to satisfy the author's goals-to verify that WW II was basically between 1939 and 1945. Just how many 3 year olds fight in wars? Even in the latest stages of WW II his father wouldn't have been more than 9. Does that mean that Mr. Obama is a liar, or simply chooses to alter the facts to satisfy his imagination or political purposes (still qualifies as a "liar").
Just Curious........

Tuesday, September 17, 2013

Costs of Government

'New' Blogger deleting posts by 'key' words detected on algorithms? Censorship in support of political agenda? Restrictions related to source of published format? So many questions. See another interesting example below from a 'Guest'. Derived from information read in daily LA TIMES news paper publication, It contained the name of this sitting president, his adamant supporters, cabinet members, appointees, their politically powered atrocities accepted with no question by the 'news' media and was received in an AOL email.

"I will not sign a plan that adds one dime to our deficit either now or in the future."

September 9, 2009
Barack Obama
Actually he was technically correct. He did not add one dime, he added trillions of dollars. So take that you Tea Party racists.
So what's wrong with California's economy? Well consider this from the LA LA Times:
Janet Napolitano, former Democratic governor of Arizona, former head of Homeland Security, and now president of the University of California system.
Her base salary is:                                        $570,000/year (more than Obama)
A rented mansion:                                         $10,000/mo. Or $120K/yr.
Auto allowance:                                             $8,916/yr.
A one time relocation expense:                       $145,500 (must have a lot of stuff)
These are ALL taxpayer funded costs.
She has no academic experience, except as a student.
Wonder if the so called students against capitalists and the so called 99%ers will demonstrate in front of her mansion? Don't bet on it, hypocrisy rules the Democrats. Someone has to pay for those $35,000 fundraiser dinners that Obama has for the Little Guy.
In any compromise between food and poison, it is only death that can win.
In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit.
Ayn Rand
Remember that when the latest negotiations begin over the budget cuts. Don't expect Obama to cut anything, he has another vacation planned, after the last vacation. White House is still closed "To The Children", while the First Family of Parasites vacation, and the mainstream media sees nothing wrong with this. 
The GOP will be vilified for not raising the debt limit, the Democrats and their media lap dogs will call the Republicans greedy, selfish, obstructionist, and uncaring. Remember 'compassion' is the key word for the Democrats, see the above quote and costs.
Want to laugh? Many far left wing Socialist-Liberal-Progressive-Democrats see themselves as moderates. That's phunny, but none can define far-left.
Show me where I'm wrong.

Monday, September 16, 2013

The Fall of the United States

  • The Fall of the U.S.A.‏

9/12/13 Guest posts copied from AOL email (among others) seemingly censored? This sitting president's name seems to elicit algorithms to detect and enable censorship? Is this only certain postings? Or is 'New' Blogger super sensitive?

Welcome to Buenos Aires on the Potomac. Our personality-driven, politically correct, and rabidly partisan politics are finally catching up with us.
(Neatly conflating our deadly superficial politics and debased popular "culture," just other day the Huffington Post (AOHELL) ran a byline story reporting that Madonna says we should stay out of Syria. Seriously. We're supposed to consider an entertainer whose shtick the last 30 years has been to behave like a streetwalker on and off stage is someone whose opinion on foreign policy should be reported with a straight face and be taken seriously.)
Note from Robo: She's as good as anyone in the Obama administration. My apology to streetwalkers.
Obama was unfit for the office he was elected to in 2008, and he is unfit for the office now. This is not a partisan statement. From TARP to Obamacare to the Budget to Benghazi to Syria, can anyone make a case that this is a person serious about managing our domestic and foreign affairs, never mind the lighter lifting like setting a tone of high-mindedness and civility in our public discourse? Evidence, please.
And if there are persons in his administration capable of appealing to the better angels of his nature-if there be such-and making of him, through a team effort, as serious and wise administrator of the executive branch, where have they been hiding for the last four-and-one-half years?
By all means, appeal to our leadership class's better instincts, but in the end whether something can come of it depends on the quality of the human being who comprise it. And right now, looking at all the major players, I don't see anyone or any group of people who give any sign of getting our economy rolling again or protecting our national interests abroad. I would like to say differently, but I think this especially applies to the guy in the White House. It's not in him, and it's not in the people around him.
Robert Steckler
When one looks at the minions surrounding Obama, their blatant and consistent willingness to lie, to subvert (and to blame) it doesn't bode well for our nation, at all. You and I understood this from well before November 2008: now the world has taken off the rose colored glasses and can see the emperor has no clothes. Except this isn't a Hans Christian Anderson fairy tail and it looks more like we are heading for an un-edited Brothers Grimm type of ending.
It isn't funny and it isn't going to change because the thinking that put us where we are is the same thinking Obama and Company) being used to solve our problems.
Robin Leigh
How did the administration fumble the issue on Syria?
Aug. 2012- president draws a red line, those were his words.
March/April 2013- Syria used chemical weapons crossing the red line-minimal causalities-no comment from the administration.
Aug. 21, 2013- Chemical weapons used again, ie: 1400 dead.
Obama calls for action-described as limited strikes -speech #1.
Kerry calls for action.
Obama says stop-need to let Congress vote (did he forget about Congress before speech #1?)
Kerry calls for action. Obama says it is not his red line
Kerry has verbal diarrhea and says it may be okay if they give up their weapons.
Obama in several interviews, latches onto this concept-says trust and maybe verify (?).
What is the policy?
Keith Dowling
Remember it was Kerry, who as presidential candidate, displayed the Vietnam War medals he won for battles never fought and the same medals he burned before un-burned them. Same Kerry who voted for Afghanistan and Iraq wars before he voted against them. A true parasite who lives on the fortune of ketchup.
Voters in 2008 voted for Obama and chose color over competence.
Voters in 2012 voted for Obama and chose freebies over integrity.
The city of Compton, CA (a suburb of Los Angeles) has voted itself a new mayor.
All of the qualifications for office are listed:
African-The most important, that will get votes to any office as proven by the Obama voters.
Female-Here's another major point, being African female will get you anywhere.
Vogue-Had appeared in Vogue magazine. Not a major qualification but coupled with the above two almost didn't need an election.
Community Organizer-This is the clincher. Community organizer along with the above you may as well be seeing the next president of the United States if the Democrats have anything to say about it.
By the way, if one hasn't already guessed, Compton has one of the highest crime rates in the city, not THE highest, but one of the highest. Guns are not allowed, that's why there is almost a shooting a day. But then this is not news.
Show me where I'm wrong.